); ga('send', 'pageview');

Developmental Differences in Interview Instructions

Episode 3

More to read

Developmental Differences in Interview Instructions 

Log into CALiO™ or contact the librarian to obtain publications.  

The use of ground rules in investigative interviews with children: A synthesis and call for research (Brubacher, Poole, & Dickinson, 2015). 

Developmental differences in children’s learning and use of forensic ground rules during an interview about an experienced event (Brown, Lewis, Lamb, Gwynne, Kitto, & Stairmand, 2019). 

The effects of practice on children’s ability to apply ground rules in a narrative interview (Danby, Brubacher, Sharman, & Powell, 2015). 

Children’s performance on ground rules questions: Implications for forensic interviewing (Dickinson, Brubacher, & Poole, 2015). 

An examination of “Don’t Know” responses in forensic interviews with children (Earhart,  
La Rooy, Brubacher, & Lamb, 2014). 

Setting the ground rules: Use and practice of ground rules in child forensic interviews (Fessinger, McWilliams, Bakth, & Lyon, 2020).  

Young children’s understanding that promising guarantees performance: The effects of age and maltreatment (Lyon & Evans, 2014). 

Forensic interviewers’ experiences of interviewing children of different ages (Magnusson, Ernberg, Landstrom, & Akehurst, 2020). 

Children’s requests for clarification in investigative interviews about suspected sexual abuse (Malloy, Katz, Lamb, & Mugno, 2015). 

The effect of delay and individual differences on children’s tendency to guess (Waterman & Blades, 2013). 

210 Pratt Avenue
Huntsville, Alabama 35801
Tel: 256.533.KIDS (5437)
Fax: 256.534.6883

Follow Us


Child Abuse Library Online (CALiO) is supported by a grant awarded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.